Yesterday evening I attended Boris Johnson’s People’s Question Time in the pugilistic splendour of Bethnal Green’s York Hall. The evening was chaired by Labour’s John Biggs who sported an air of good-humoured antagonism towards the Mayor throughout. The audience followed suit, booing Boris as he stood up to speak but being otherwise fairly genial.
Boris began by listing the achievements of his tenure to date; the Freedom Pass, the Oysterisation of the transport network, a bicycle hire scheme, Crossrail and Tube modernisation. Weren’t all these schemes instituted by Ken Livingstone, I asked politely? A typical Boris dodge followed. “Umm, I didn’t quite see you, but I’m sure the question was meant benevolently, so we’ll move on”, he mumbled.
The real answer was given by John Biggs, who said Boris “took all the credit for the improvements and blamed the government for the problems”. Boris failed to give a convincing explanation for the traffic chaos during the snow last month, and his claims to be a champion of cyclists rang hollow when the audience complained about the scheme to allow motorcyclists into bus lanes and the lack of investment in the cycle network.
A popular topic during the meeting was knife crime. The BNP’s Richard Barnbrook, suggested custodial sentences for all those caught in possession of knives. He was quickly shouted down by members of the prison service in the audience who explained from their own experience “prison doesn’t work”.
On housing, Johnson was asked a direct question about whether he would stick to his election pledge of building 50,000 affordable homes in the capital. “I am optimistic . . . but the figure will be hard to reach due to the state of the market”, he said. A simple ‘no’ would have sufficed.
However, the question which really seemed to flummox Boris was whether all the feral cats on the Olympics’ site had been caught. You can rest easy; apparently they have.
It was obvious that Boris didn’t have Ken’s detailed knowledge about London, and he often asked questioners to send him more information so he could help at a later date. But such response often successfully deflected and satisfied questioners, a particular skill of his it seems. This, coupled with an apparent drift to the centre and the continuation of a number of Ken’s policies in the capital, means that Labour will need a mayoral candidate who engages directly with voters and their concerns to be elected in 2012. A fact worryingly evidenced by the 60% approval rating Boris received in a somewhat unscientific electronic poll conducted at the end of the evening.
Did Ken do any better on affordable housing? He was in power during the greatest housing bubble in history, yet he did nothing to keep housing affordable. Now you carp about Boris and affordable housing? I don't like him much either but don't forget that the housing shortages have developed further over 10 years of Labour government, during a time of constant economic growth. Arguably, Labour could have done something about it but they didn't. It's probably a lot to do with MPs and their over generous housing expenses. They don't really feel the pain do they? That's why they do nothing.
Posted by: Rob H | Wednesday, April 08, 2009 at 10:19 PM
How exactly was the Mayor of London with his restricted power meant to 'keep housing affordable'. Ken did all he could namely:
a) persuading the government to allow him to decide housing strategy in London and new developments (this was not within the remit of the Mayor at first); and
b) 'forcing' new developments to meet 50% affordable housing targets. These targets were flexible so as to not make building uneconomic (eg. a development in Bethnal Green only had 35% affordable housing, but the developer wouldn't have built it if he'd been forced to have more).
The comment in my blog entry about Boris and affordable housing was not meant to be a wider remark about housing bubbles.
House prices have been high for those not on the property ladder (such as myself) and are naturally correcting themselves. I can't comment on whether there is a 'housing shortage' in the capital.
Posted by: Chris N | Thursday, April 09, 2009 at 09:24 AM
OK, so Ken did all he could, did Labour. I speak as someone who believed Gordon Brown when he said in 1997 that he wouldn't let house prices get out of control (1997 budget speech). I believed in his ideas of prudence. Something went wrong and a bubble formed under his watch. I have great difficulty believing in him again. I'm not a Tory plant by the way... just someone who thinks housing has been neglected by Labour and they still don't have any ideas to put it right other than relying on speculators and the private sector.
Posted by: Rob H | Thursday, April 09, 2009 at 11:01 AM